槽道流POD重构及湍流动能耗散率分析

doi:10.19596/j.cnki.1001-246x.7619

计算物理 ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 169-177.DOI: 10.19596/j.cnki.1001-246x.7619

槽道流POD重构及湍流动能耗散率分析

陈彬, 刘阁

重庆工商大学废油资源化技术与装备工程研究中心, 重庆 400067

收稿日期:2017-01-03 修回日期:2017-05-24 出版日期:2018-03-25 发布日期:2018-03-25
作者简介:陈彬(1972-),男,博士,教授,主要从事流体动力学研究,E-mail:hustchb@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51375516）及重庆基础与前沿研究（cstc2016jcyjA0185）资助项目

Anslysis of Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate and POD Reconstruction of a Channel Flow

CHEN Bin, LIU Ge

Engineering Research Centre for Waste Oil Recovery Technology and Equipment Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China

Received:2017-01-03 Revised:2017-05-24 Online:2018-03-25 Published:2018-03-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用二维粒子图像测速仪（2DPIV）对槽道内涡波流场进行实验研究，用POD技术对2DPIV瞬态速度矢量场进行主导模态重构，得到槽道内的平均流速和湍流动能分布；采用大涡PIV方法对湍流动能耗散率分布进行计算.结果表明：重构流场表征了原始流场的主导结构，剔除了噪声等干扰信息；大涡PIV方法能有效地估算动能耗散率的分布；湍流动能在壁面附近较小，在接近槽道中心区域湍流动能越来越大，呈现出射流的特征；动能耗散率的峰值出现在壁面附近和槽道中心区域，动能耗散率随着远离壁面程度的增加先降低后逐渐增加直至达到峰值.

关键词: 槽道, 涡波流场, 2DPIV测量, POD重构, 动能耗散率

Abstract: Vortex wave flow field within a channel was measured using particle image velocimetry (2DPIV). Instantaneous velocity vector field measured was reconstructed with dominant modes using POD technology. Average velocity and turbulent kinetic energy distribution were obtained using POD reconstructed field. Turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate was estimated by using a large eddy PIV method. It shows that dominated structure of original flow field were characterized by reconstruction of flow field. Noise and other interference information were eliminated. Large eddy PIV method estimates effectively distribution of kinetic energy dissipation rate. Turbulent kinetic energy is small in vicinity of wall. Turbulent kinetic energy increases near center of channel region, which is characteristics of jet. Kinetic energy dissipation rate peak appears in vicinity of central region and channel wall. Away from wall kinetic energy dissipation rate is increases initially, and decreased gradually until it reaches a peak.

Key words: channel, vortex wave flow field, 2DPIV measurement, POD reconstruction, kinetic energy dissipation rate

中图分类号:

O357.5

陈彬, 刘阁. 槽道流POD重构及湍流动能耗散率分析[J]. 计算物理, 2018, 35(2): 169-177.

CHEN Bin, LIU Ge. Anslysis of Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate and POD Reconstruction of a Channel Flow[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2018, 35(2): 169-177.

参考文献

[1] KRESTA S M, WOOD P E. The flow field produced by a pitched blade turbine:Characterization of the turbulence and estimation of the dissipation rate[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1993, 48(10):1761-1774.
[2] SREENIVASAN K R. An update on the energy dissipation rate in isotropic turbulence[J].Physics of Fluids, 1998,10(2):528-529.
[3] BANAKH V A, SMALIKHO I N, KOPP F, et al. Measurements of turbulent energy dissipation rate with a CW doppler lidar in the atmospheric boundary layer[J]. Journal of Atmospheric & Oceanic Technology, 1999,16(1999):1044-1061.
[4] GRAFTIEAUX L, MICHARD M, GROSJEAN N. Combining PIV, POD and vortex identification algorithms for the study of unsteady turbulent swirling flows[J]. Meas Sci Technol, 2001,12(9):1422-1429.
[5] SAARENRINNE P, PⅡRTO M. Turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate estimation from PIV velocity vector fields[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2000,29(1):S300-S307.
[6] CHE Cuncun,TIAN Maocheng. PIV experimenton flow disturbance characteristics of embedded trapezoid winglets in tube[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013,64(11):3976-3984.
[7] WOODCOCK J D, MARUSIC I. The statistical behaviour of attached eddies[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2015,27(1):97-120.
[8] ANTONIA R A, PEARSON B R. Effect of initial conditions on the mean energy dissipation rate and the scaling exponent[J]. Physical Review E, 2000,62(6):8086-8090.
[9] TANAKA T, EATON J K. A correction method for measuring turbulence kinetic energy dissipation rate by PIV[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2007,42(6):893-902.
[10] HOQUE M M, SATHE M J, MITRA S, et al. Comparison of specific energy dissipation rate calculation methodologies utilising 2D PIV velocity measurement[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2015,137(12):752-767.
[11] SHENG J, MENG H, FOX R. A large eddy PIV method for turbulence dissipation rate estimation[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2000,55(20):4423-4434.
[12] DUAN Yali, CHEN Xianjin, KONG Linghua. Lattice Boltzmann model for compound Burgers-Korteweg-de Vries equation[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics,2015,32(6):639-648
[13] WANG Hanfeng, LIU Caohui, GUO Fushui,et al. Estimation of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate in channel flow by PIV[J]. CIESC Journal, 2004,55(7):1066-1071.
[14] KYSELA B, ÍKOVÁ D J, KONFRŠT J, et al. Estimation of turbulence dissipation rate by large eddy PIV method in an agitated vessel[J].Experimental Fluid Mechanics,2014,92(5):02045.
[15] BANDYOPADHYAY S, LAYEK G C. Numerical computation of pulsatile flow through a locally constricted channel[J]. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 2011,16(1):252-265.
[16] DESHMUKH A, VASAVA V, PATANKAR A, et al. Particle velocity distribution in a flow of gas-solid mixture through a horizontal channel[J]. Powder Technology, 2016,298(9):119-129.
[17] DUAN F, SONG K, LI H, et al. Numerical study of laminar flow and heat transfer characteristics in the fin side of the intermittent wavy finned flat tube heat exchanger[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016,103(25):112-127.
[18] WEI Z, ZANG B, NEW T H, et al. A proper orthogonal decomposition study on the unsteady flow behaviour of a hydrofoil with leading-edge tubercles[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2016,121(5):356-368.
[19] BUHL S, HARTMANN F, HASSE C. Identification of large-scale structure fluctuations in IC engines using POD-based conditional averaging[J]. Oil & Gas Science and Technology,2016,71(1):1-10.
[20] CHEN H, REUSS D L, SICK V. On the use and interpretation of proper orthogonal decomposition of in-cylinder engine flows[J]. Measurement Science & Technology, 2012.
[21] HOPFINGER J E, TOLY A J. Spatially decaying turbulence and its relation to mixing across density interfaces[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1976,78(1):155-175.

槽道流POD重构及湍流动能耗散率分析

Anslysis of Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate and POD Reconstruction of a Channel Flow

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

作者中心

审稿中心

期刊浏览

期刊介绍

[1]	胡军, 刘婵, 张年梅, 倪明玖. 磁流体方腔槽道流整体线性稳定性数值方法研究[J]. 计算物理, 2016, 33(4): 379-390.
[2]	刘东, 蒋斌, 刘明侯. 粗糙度对大高宽比槽道内流动影响的数值模拟[J]. 计算物理, 2013, 30(5): 759-765.
[3]	杨学军, 蒋建政, 樊菁. 矩形微槽道气体流动的速度分布[J]. 计算物理, 2007, 24(2): 181-186.
[4]	许春晓, 吴超, 崔桂香. 壁面在展向作周期运动的槽道湍流的大涡模拟[J]. 计算物理, 2006, 23(5): 537-544.
[5]	刘宇陆, 蒋剑波, 邱翔, 卢志明. 充分发展槽道湍流的小波数值分析[J]. 计算物理, 2005, 22(3): 197-205.
[6]	谢翀, 樊菁, 沈青. 微槽道气体流动的统计模拟[J]. 计算物理, 2002, 19(5): 377-382.