c/uA及mi/me取值对于磁重联过程的影响

doi:10.19596/j.cnki.1001-246x.7881

计算物理 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 427-439.DOI: 10.19596/j.cnki.1001-246x.7881

c/u_A及m_i/m_e取值对于磁重联过程的影响

钱仁锋

浙江大学聚变理论与模拟中心, 浙江杭州 310027

收稿日期:2018-04-10 修回日期:2018-05-31 出版日期:2019-07-25 发布日期:2019-07-25
作者简介:钱仁锋(1992-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为向磁重联,E-mail:rfqian@zju.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（41474123）资助项目

Influences of c/u_A and m_i/m_e on Magnetic Reconnection Process

QIAN Renfeng

Institute for Fusion Theory and Simulation, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, China

Received:2018-04-10 Revised:2018-05-31 Online:2019-07-25 Published:2019-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 构造控制电磁场散度误差的有限差分方法，该方法结构简单，可将电磁场散度误差控制在舍入误差量级.该方法应用到GEM，得到的结果与已发表文献类似.研究双流体模型中可调参数光速和离子与电子的质量比对磁重联过程的影响.结果表明：光速增加后，净电荷的积累减少，而重联率几乎不变.离子与电子质量比增加导致电流片变薄，从而使得重联加快.

关键词: 有限差分, 电磁场散度误差, 磁重联, 光速, 离子与电子的质量比

Abstract: A finite difference scheme to control divergence error of electromagnetic field is proposed to study magnetic reconnection. With this simple numerical scheme, divergence errors of electromagnetic field are limited in the magnitude of rounding error. Our results are in good agreement with that in GEM. Influences of c/u_A and m_i/m_e on magnetic reconnection are also studied. It indicated that with the increase of c/u_A, net charge densities decrease while reconnection rate remains almost unchanged. The increase of m_i/m_e could lead to current sheet thinning and acceleration of reconnection.

Key words: finite difference method, divergence error of electromagnetic field, magnetic reconnection, speed of light, ion to electron mass ratio

中图分类号:

P354.4

钱仁锋. c/u_A及m_i/m_e取值对于磁重联过程的影响[J]. 计算物理, 2019, 36(4): 427-439.

QIAN Renfeng. Influences of c/u_A and m_i/m_e on Magnetic Reconnection Process[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2019, 36(4): 427-439.

参考文献

[1] 李定,陈银华,马锦秀,等. 等离子体物理学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2006:2.
[2] 王水,李罗权. 磁场重联[M]. 合肥:安徽教育出版社, 1999:1.
[3] BIRN J, DRAKE J F, SHAY M A, et al. Geospace environmental modeling (GEM) magnetic reconnection challenge[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Space Physics, 2001,106(A3):3715-3719.
[4] YANG Zhen, LU Xingqiang, GONG Xueyu. Stabilization of double tearing mode by external current drive[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2015, 32(5):617-622.
[5] SRINIVASAN B, SHUMLAK U. Analytical and computational study of the ideal full two-fluid plasma model and asymptotic approximations for Hall-magnetohydrodynamics[J]. Physics of Plasmas,2011,18(9):092113.
[6] HUANG Tao, HUANG Zhaoqin, ZHANG Jianguang, et al. Non-Darcy flow simulation of oil-water phase in low permeability reservoirs based on mimetic finite difference method[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 33(6):707-716.
[7] KUANG Xiaojing, WANG Daoping, ZHANG Liang, et al. Finite difference time-domain method based on high order compact scheme[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2014, 31(1):91-95.
[8] MUNZ C D,OMMES P,SCHNEIDER R. A three-dimensional finite-volume solver for the Maxwell equations with divergence cleaning on unstructured meshes[J]. Computer Physics Communications,2000,130(1-2):83-117.
[9] 郭硕鸿. 电动力学[M]. 3版. 北京:高等教育出版社,2008:153-158.
[10] LAGUNA A A,LANI A,DECONINCK H,et al. A fully-implicit finite-volume method for multi-fluid reactive and collisional magnetized plasmas on unstructured meshes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics,2016,318:252-276.
[11] HESSE M, BIRN J, KUZNETSOVA M. Collisionless magnetic reconnection:Electron processes and transport modeling[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Space Physics, 2001, 106(A3):3721-3735.
[12] SUSANTO A. Development of electromagnetic solvers for use with the two-fluid plasma algorithm[D]. University of Washington, 2009.
[13] JI Hantao, DAUGHTON W. Phase diagram for magnetic reconnection in heliophysical, astrophysical, and laboratory plasmas[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2011. 18(11):111207.
[14] BIRN J, HESSE M. Geospace environment modeling (GEM) magnetic reconnection challenge:Resistive tearing, anisotropic pressure and Hall effects[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Space Physics, 2001, 106(A3):3737-3750.
[15] SHAY M A, DRAKE J F, ROGERS B N, et al. Alfvénic collisionless magnetic reconnection and the Hall term[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Space Physics, 2001, 106(A3):3759-3772.
[16] 赵波, 朱国全, 郭俊. 无碰撞磁场重联中c/v_A对电子动力学的影响[C]. 中国地球物理学会年会, 2011.
[17] MA Zhiwei, FENG Shuling. Generation of electric field and net charge in Hall reconnection[J]. Chinese Physics Letters, 2008, 25(8):2934-2937.
[18] 冯淑玲. 磁场重联系统中垂直电场和霍尔电荷的研究[D]. 合肥:中国科学院合肥物质科学研究院, 2008.

c/u_A及m_i/m_e取值对于磁重联过程的影响

Influences of c/u_A and m_i/m_e on Magnetic Reconnection Process

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

作者中心

审稿中心

期刊浏览

期刊介绍

[1]	孙杰, 程仁寨, 李云, 房洪杰, 汪洪波, 陈小龙. Au@碳球复合结构中Au颗粒位置调控光吸收[J]. 计算物理, 2021, 38(6): 735-741.
[2]	曹启伟, 肖德龙, 杨显俊, 王建国. 磁瑞利-泰勒不稳定性非线性演化数值模拟[J]. 计算物理, 2021, 38(1): 5-15.
[3]	朱湘琴, 吴伟, 张国伟, 蔡利兵. 大型水平极化电磁脉冲有界波模拟器的并行模拟分析[J]. 计算物理, 2019, 36(6): 691-698.
[4]	任新成, 朱小敏, 郭立新. 土壤表面与部分埋藏多目标复合散射的时域有限差分方法[J]. 计算物理, 2019, 36(5): 569-576.
[5]	郑洲顺, 刘振, 耿婷婷, 吴晓新, 汤慧萍, 王建忠. 金属纤维烧结过程的分数阶模型[J]. 计算物理, 2019, 36(5): 595-602.
[6]	李志勇. 全堆芯Pin by Pin中子扩散节块法CMFD加速[J]. 计算物理, 2019, 36(3): 317-322.
[7]	高云, 邹丽, 宗智. 基于有限差分法刚性圆柱体涡激振动响应特性数值研究[J]. 计算物理, 2019, 36(1): 53-59.
[8]	张玉强. 复杂色散介质电磁特性分析的扩展Newmark-FDTD方法[J]. 计算物理, 2017, 34(6): 673-678.
[9]	任新成, 朱小敏, 刘鹏. 雪层覆盖土壤表面与半埋柱体宽带复合散射FDTD方法[J]. 计算物理, 2017, 34(3): 327-334.
[10]	刘广东. 一种乳腺癌检测的改进微波共焦成像方法[J]. 计算物理, 2017, 34(1): 82-88.
[11]	黄涛, 黄朝琴, 张建光, 姚军. 基于模拟有限差分的低渗透油藏非达西油水两相流动数值模拟[J]. 计算物理, 2016, 33(6): 707-716.
[12]	王林雪, 宗谨, 王雪玲, 石玉仁. mBBM方程的双扭结孤立波及其动力学稳定性[J]. 计算物理, 2016, 33(2): 212-220.
[13]	郑奎松, 罗欢, 余慧, 丁腾江. 分析水下目标的大比例变换总场散射场源FDTD方法[J]. 计算物理, 2016, 33(1): 75-82.
[14]	姜彦南, 刘文, 王娇, 张文翠. 瞬变电磁场模拟中的CPML吸收边界条件[J]. 计算物理, 2015, 32(6): 701-708.
[15]	刘广东, 余广群, 范士民. 德拜色散媒质的三维时域电磁逆散射技术[J]. 计算物理, 2015, 32(4): 455-468.

c/uA及mi/me取值对于磁重联过程的影响

Influences of c/uA and mi/me on Magnetic Reconnection Process

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

作者中心

审稿中心

期刊浏览

期刊介绍

c/u_A及m_i/m_e取值对于磁重联过程的影响

Influences of c/u_A and m_i/m_e on Magnetic Reconnection Process