存在动态非达西效应的复合油藏试井分析方法

doi:10.19596/j.cnki.1001-246x.8674

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为准确描述低渗油藏注水井附近储层渗流变化规律及影响因素, 提出一种存在动态非达西效应的复合油藏试井分析方法。该方法首先考虑内区渗流方式为达西流, 外区渗流方式为启动压力梯度效应和动态渗透率效应构成的非达西流。其次采用数值法进行离散求解, 计算得到注水井井底压力。然后绘制井底压力响应典型曲线图版, 典型曲线主要分为井储段、过渡段、内区径向流段、外区低渗流段和边界反映段共5个流动段。最后对启动压力梯度、动态渗透率参数进行敏感性分析, 并对比不同渗流规律的压力响应。以长庆油田某注水井为例, 进行试井解释。结果表明: 该注水井周围的渗透率较大, 外区受启动压力梯度和动态渗透率的共同影响, 存在启动压力梯度、渗透率较小, 符合现场实际。常规油藏注水井复合试井分析方法以及低渗油藏单区试井分析方法均为该方法的一种特例。

关键词: 低渗油藏, 注水井, 启动压力梯度, 动态渗透率, 复合油藏, 试井分析方法

Abstract:

In order to accurately describe the change law and influencing factors of reservoir seepage flow near injection wells in low permeability reservoirs, a well test analysis method for composite reservoir with dynamic non-Darcy effect outside injection wells was constructed. Firstly, Darcy flow is considered as the inner seepage mode, and non-Darcy flow as the outer seepage mode composed of starting pressure gradient effect and dynamic permeability effect. Secondly, numerical method is used for discrete solution to calculate the bottom-hole pressure of the injection well, and then the typical curve of bottom-hole pressure response is drawn. Typical curves are divided into 5 flow sections: wellbore storage section, transition section, inner radial flow section, outer low seepage flow section and boundary reflection section. Finally, sensitivity analysis of starting pressure gradient and dynamic permeability parameters is carried out, and pressure response of different seepage laws is compared. Taking an injection well in Changqing Oilfield as an example, the well test results show that the permeability around the injection well is larger, and the outer zone is affected by the combination of starting pressure gradient and dynamic permeability, and there is a starting pressure gradient in the outer area, and the permeability is smaller, which is consistent with the field practice. This method is a relatively general numerical pressure calculation method, among which the conventional injection well composite well test analysis method and low permeability reservoir single zone test analysis method are special cases of this method.

Key words: low permeability reservoir, injection wells, starting pressure gradient, dynamic permeability, composite reservoir, well test analysis method

中图分类号:

TE353

刘永川, 程康, 姜胜, 余杰, 郑显林. 存在动态非达西效应的复合油藏试井分析方法[J]. 计算物理, 2023, 40(6): 718-726.

Yongchuan LIU, Kang CHENG, Sheng JIANG, Jie YU, Xianlin ZHENG. Well Test Analysis Method for Composite Reservoir with Dynamic Non-Darcy Flow Effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2023, 40(6): 718-726.

图/表 6

图1 井底压力响应典型曲线(a) 无限大边界；(b) 封闭边界

Fig.1 Chart of bottom hole pressure response curves (a) infinite boundary; (b) closed boundary

图2 启动压力梯度G变化曲线

Fig.2 Curves of starting pressure gradient G

图3 外区渗透率Ko变化曲线

Fig.3 Curves of outer zone permeability Ko

图4 3种不同方法井底压力响应曲线(a) 无限大边界；(b) 封闭边界

Fig.4 Curves of bottom hole pressure with 3 different methods (a) infinite boundary; (b) closed boundary

图5 压力剖面曲线

Fig.5 Pressure profile curve

图6 实例井试井曲线与理论曲线拟合

Fig.6 Fitting diagram of example well test curve and theoretical curves

参考文献 28

1	郭智, 位云生, 孟德伟, 等. 苏里格致密砂岩气田水平井差异化部署新方法[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42 (2): 100- 109.
2	WU M L , ZHU J M , LI L L , et al. Calculation of perforated vertical and horizontal well productivity in low-permeability reservoirs[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2020, 35 (2): 218- 236.
3	张记刚, 杜猛, 陈超, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩储层孔隙结构定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34 (4): 89- 102.
4	李亚婷, 晋月, 李小伟, 等. 黄陵地区S区块长6注水开发动态分析[J]. 延安大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 40 (4): 81- 84.
5	赵国忠, 董大鹏, 肖鲁川. 两相低速非达西渗流模型及相对渗透率曲线求取方法[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2022, 29 (2): 69- 76.
6	李卫东, 吴亚芳, 马哲, 等. 考虑渗透率变化的低渗透油藏非达西渗流模型[J]. 陕西科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 35 (2): 111- 115. DOI
7	姚军, 刘顺. 基于动态渗透率效应的低渗透油藏试井解释模型[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30 (3): 430- 433.
8	郑春峰, 程时清, 李冬瑶. 低渗透油藏通用非达西渗流模型及压力曲线特征[J]. 大庆石油地质, 2008, 21 (2): 217- 222.
9	姜瑞忠, 倪庆东, 张春光, 等. 基于应力敏感的稠油油藏变启动压力梯度渗流模型与数值模拟研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28 (6): 54- 62.
10	LIU H P , LIU H Q , WANG J . Nonlinear percolation law in low permeability fissure cave reservoir with fractal dimension[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2018, 35 (1): 55- 63.
11	ZHONG C Y , LEUNG J Y . Numerical analysis of the effects of apparent-permeability modeling and secondary-fracture distribution for hydraulic-fractured shale-gas production analysis[J]. SPE Reservior Evaluation & Engineering, 2020, 23 (4): 1233- 1250.
12	李彦泽, 段彬, 商琳, 等. 特低渗、致密油藏非线性渗流数值模拟方法及其在冀东油田的应用[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2022, 41 (6): 153- 158.
13	CHEN Z M , ZHOU B , ZHANG S Q , et al. Pressure transient behaviors of discretely fractured reservoirs using a numerical discrete fracture model[J]. SPE Production & Operations, 2022, 37 (4): 748- 761.
14	LIU Q, LI X F, YANG J, et al. A study of seepage characteristics of unsteady waterflooding development for fractured ultra-low-permeability reservoir[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 Society of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, 2021: 1-8.
15	姜瑞忠, 高岳, 崔永正, 等. 基于应力敏感效应和启动压力梯度的双重介质低渗油藏邻井干扰试井模型[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2020, 44 (1): 112- 120. DOI
16	LI L, LIANG W, YAN Z H, et al. A novel method of non-Darcy well test interpretation for ultra-low permeability reservoirs[C]// Proceedings of the 2020 Society of Petroleum Engineers Conference on Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2020: 1-8.
17	李承龙, 李敏, 何鑫迪. 基于压敏效应的变启动压力梯度渗流模型[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2021, 40 (1): 1- 9.
18	黄亮. 低渗油藏注水井达-非达西耦合试井模型及压力分析[J]. 油气井测试, 2017, 26 (4): 12- 15.
19	FANG S D , WANG W H , WU Y H , et al. Transient behavior analysis of fractured horizontal wells based on an improved Green element method[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 37 (1): 69- 78.
20	RAO X , ZHAO H , LIU Y N . A meshless numerical modeling method for fractured reservoirs based on extended finite volume method[J]. SPE Journal, 2022, 27 (6): 3525- 3564.
21	ZHANG J , CHENG SH Q , ZENG Y , et al. Applicability exploration of superposition principle for pressure transient analysis in polymer-flooding system[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2021, 38 (3): 324- 332.
22	刘斌, 兰卫星, 万芬, 等. 低渗透油藏变渗透率非达西试井模型[J]. 油气井测试, 2022, 31 (2): 1- 6.
23	姜永, 张雷, 别旭伟, 等. 裂缝性油藏注水井压降试井解释方法及应用[J]. 断块油气田, 2017, 24 (4): 565- 569.
24	JI A Z , WANG Y F , ZHANG G S . Transient pressure for a fractured well with asymmetric fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 36 (1): 47- 52.
25	樊冬艳, 曾慧, 姚军, 等. 考虑启动压力梯度的致密油藏不稳定试井解析方法[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2021, 45 (2): 102- 112.
26	李淑霞, 谷建伟. 油藏数值模拟基础[M]. 青岛: 中国石油大学出版社, 2009.
27	成绥民, 甘庆明, 成珍, 等. 低渗油藏非线性渗流压力分析[J]. 油气井测试, 2005, 14 (3): 1- 4.
28	LI D C, IONESCU C L, EHIGHEBOLO I T, et al. Modeling and simulation of non-Darcy or turbulent flow for oil wells[C]// Proceedings of the 2022 Society of Petroleum Engineers Conference on Annual Caspian Technical Conference, 2022: 1-9.

[1]	刘化普, 刘慧卿, 王敬. 分形低渗透缝洞型油藏非线性渗流规律[J]. 计算物理, 2018, 35(1): 55-63.
[2]	何聪鸽, 范子菲, 许安著, 方思冬, 李博凯. 特低渗透油藏面积井网见水时间计算[J]. 计算物理, 2016, 33(2): 190-196.
[3]	刘文超, 姚军, 王建忠. 低渗透多孔介质非达西渗流动边界界面追踪[J]. 计算物理, 2012, 29(6): 823-827.
[4]	罗艳艳, 程林松, 黄世军. 考虑动半径和粘度变化的稠油非牛顿不稳定渗流数学模型[J]. 计算物理, 2011, 28(6): 869-874.
[5]	马晓丹, 同登科, 马华伟. 变形双重介质分形油藏非达西流动分析[J]. 计算物理, 2007, 24(2): 197-202.
[6]	向开理, 涂晓青. 分形复合油藏非牛顿幂律流体不稳定渗流的数学模型[J]. 计算物理, 2004, 21(6): 558-564.