COMPARISONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT NUMERICAL METHODS FOR CALCULATING CFP OF NUCLEONS

CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS ›› 1998, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1): 13-18.

Previous Articles Next Articles

COMPARISONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT NUMERICAL METHODS FOR CALCULATING CFP OF NUCLEONS

Chen Jianhua¹, Li Xiaomei², Du Huixian¹

1. Deparment of Applied Physics, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073;
2. Deparment of Electron Technology, Command Technology Institute, Beijing 101407

Received:1996-06-25 Revised:1997-05-13 Online:1998-01-25 Published:1998-01-25

Abstract

Abstract: Four numerical methods for calculating coefficients of fractional parentage(CFP) of nucleons are compared,and the results show that the method of complete space by neutron-proton couplied is much better than that of over complete space,the method of factorization by group chains is much better than that of non factorization,and there are great differences of calculating amonut between different methods.

Key words: nucleon, conefficients of frational parentage, numerical method, nuclear physics, shell model

CLC Number:

O411
O571

Chen Jianhua, Li Xiaomei, Du Huixian. COMPARISONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT NUMERICAL METHODS FOR CALCULATING CFP OF NUCLEONS[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1998, 15(1): 13-18.

[1]	LI Kang, LI Shouxian, LIU Na. High-precision Numerical Simulation of Strong Explosion Fireball with Adaptive Mesh [J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2021, 38(2): 146-152.
[2]	TAO Yingxue, ZHAO Qiang, CHEN Faliang. Numerical Methods for Laser Ablation with Phase Change in Two-dimensional Code on Structured Meshes [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2014, 31(2): 165-172.
[3]	HU Zehua, SUN Weili, WANG Jia, ZHANG Benai. A Semi-microscopic Proton Optical Potential [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2010, 27(5): 745-751.
[4]	LIU Fuchun, JIN Mingxing, GAO Xin, LU Xiuxiu, DING Dajun. Numerical Method of Field Distribution in Hexapole and State-selection and Orietation of N₂O Molecules [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2008, 25(2): 230-234.
[5]	HU Zehua, SUN Weili, TIAN Dongfeng, ZHANG Benai. One Body Density Matrix of Nucleus in the Shell Model [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2007, 24(6): 733-739.
[6]	YANG Qing, JIN Ya-Qiu. Numerical Simulation of Correlated Scattering by Very Dense Randomly Distributed Spherical Particles [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2006, 23(4): 379-386.
[7]	WANG Hai-feng, CHEN Yi-liang. A PDF Simulation of the Lifted Turbulent H₂/N₂ Jet Flame [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2006, 23(1): 73-79.
[8]	WU Zheng-peng, YU De-hao. The Coupling of Natural Boundary Element and Finite Element for Semilinear Boundary Value Problems [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2004, 21(6): 477-483.
[9]	LIU Lin, JI Jiang-hui, LIAO Xin-hao. THE NUMERICAL METHODS OF THE RESEARCH IN THE ORBITAL EVOLUTION OF THE ASTEROIDS [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2001, 18(2): 185-188.
[10]	WANG Jian-li, REN Yu-xin, SHEN Meng-yu. THE ANALYSIS OF SEVERAL FLUX SPLITTING SCHEME BASED ON SPLINE INTERPOLATION FINITE VOLUME SCHEME [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2000, 17(4): 421-425.
[11]	LI Xiao-mei, CHEN Jian-hua. CALCULATIONS OF COMPLETE CLASSIFICATION FOR g-SHELL LSQ COUPLED STATES BY EIGENVALUES OF SCALAR OPARATOR [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2000, 17(4): 426-432.
[12]	Wu Jiming, Yu Dehao. The natural integral equation of 3-d exterior helmholtz problem and its numerical solution [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1999, 16(5): 449-456.
[13]	Zhang Suochun. Numerical methods of calculating periodic solutions [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1999, 16(4): 337-345.
[14]	Li Guangzheng. NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF NATURAL CONVECTION FOR NON-NEWTONIAN FLUIDS OVER A VERTICAL FLAT PLATE [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1998, 15(1): 19-28.
[15]	Li Danong, Ma Zhiyun. A NUMERICAL METHOD FOR DYNAMIC TEMPERATURE RISE OF ASYNCHRONOUS MOTOR [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1997, 14(S1): 453-454,452.

COMPARISONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT NUMERICAL METHODS FOR CALCULATING CFP OF NUCLEONS

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Authors

Reviewers

Journal Online

About Journal