Chinese Journal of Computational Physics ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 535-546.DOI: 10.19596/j.cnki.1001-246x.8733

Previous Articles    

Mass Exchange Network Mass Transfer Load Infeasibility Treatment and Dynamic Regulation Strategy

Siheng XIONG1(), Huanhuan DUAN2, Guomin CUI1,*(), Yuan XIAO1, Zhikang YI1   

  1. 1. School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow and Heat Transfer in Power Engineering, Shanghai 200093, China
    2. School of Energy and Intelligence Engineering, Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
  • Received:2023-03-21 Online:2024-07-25 Published:2024-08-24
  • Contact: Guomin CUI

Abstract:

In the optimization of mass exchange networks with mass transfer load as the optimization variable, using the penalty function method to deal with infeasible solutions that violate the feasible constraints on mass transfer will limit the generation of mass transfer units, and at the same time bring negative effects on the optimization algorithm's optimization path. In view of this, the negative impact of the penalty function method to deal with mass transfer constraints on optimization is analyzed, based on which a dynamic regulation strategy of mass transfer load is proposed to deal with the units mass transfer constraints by using different regulation methods, attenuating the mass transfer load of the units that violate the mass transfer constraints or eliminating the unit to ensure that the mass transfer units in the structure not violate the constraints. The validation is carried out by two mass exchange network arithmetic examples, and the obtained results demonstrate the effectiveness of the strategy by decreasing 2 943 $·a-1 and 1 697 $·a-1, respectively, compared with the optimal results in the literature, and increasing the number of mass transfer units in the structure.

Key words: mass exchange network, process integration, random walk algorithm with compulsive evolution, infeasible solutions

CLC Number: