带沟槽结构的平板流动中的熵产分析

doi:10.19596/j.cnki.1001-246x.8021

计算物理 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 182-188.DOI: 10.19596/j.cnki.1001-246x.8021

带沟槽结构的平板流动中的熵产分析

刘梅^1,2, 李曙光¹, 吴正人¹, 王松岭¹, 邓宇涵¹

1. 华北电力大学电站设备状态监测与控制教育部重点实验室, 河北保定 071003;
2. 华北电力大学经济管理系, 河北保定 071003

收稿日期:2018-12-07 修回日期:2019-02-02 出版日期:2020-03-25 发布日期:2020-03-25
通讯作者: 吴正人,E-mail:zhengren_wu@163.com
作者简介:刘梅(1977-),女(汉族),河南,在读博士,讲师,主要从事流体动力学理论及应用研究,E-mail:liumei_w@163.com
基金资助:
河北省自然科学基金（E2016502088）和中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（2015MS111）资助项目

Entropy Generation Analysis for Grooved Structure Plate Flows

LIU Mei^1,2, LI Shuguang¹, WU Zhengren¹, WANG Songling¹, DENG Yuhan¹

1. Key Laboratory of Condition Monitoring and Control for Power Plant Equipment, North China Electric Power University, Baoding, Hebei 071003, China;
2. Department of Economic Management, North China Electric Power University, Baoding, Hebei 071003, China

Received:2018-12-07 Revised:2019-02-02 Online:2020-03-25 Published:2020-03-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于大涡模拟，采用Fluent软件对带沟槽结构的平板流动过程进行熵产分析，探究沟槽结构引起的熵产变化规律.结果表明：沟槽结构能减少流动过程中的熵产，在30 m·s^-1时（Re≈20 000），近壁区总熵产减少约25%，40 m·s^-1时（Re≈27 000）减少约19%，但其结构对后续流动没有持续性影响，且随着法向高度的增加，影响逐渐变小；熵产在沟槽顶端部分的数值远大于其他区域，湍流作用引起的熵产起主要作用.所得结论为优化沟槽结构减阻提供了理论依据.

关键词: 仿生减阻, 沟槽结构, 大涡模拟, 熵产分析

Abstract: To investigate entropy generation caused by a grooved structure on flow, we used Fluent software and large eddy simulation (LES) technology to analyze entropy generation in flow over a plate with a grooved structure. It showed that a grooved structure was able to reduce entropy generation in the flow. At 30 m·s^-1(Re≈20 000), total entropy generation in near-wall region decreased by approximately 25%. And at 40 m·s^-1(Re≈27 000), it decreased by approximately 19%. However, the grooved structure did not have a sustained effect on subsequent flow. As distance from the wall in the normal direction increased, the effect decreased gradually. Entropy production at the top of the trench is much greater. And entropy production caused by turbulence is dominant. It provides a theoretical basis for optimizing drag reduction of trench structures.

Key words: bionic drag reduction, groove structure, large eddy simulate, entropy generation

中图分类号:

O355

刘梅, 李曙光, 吴正人, 王松岭, 邓宇涵. 带沟槽结构的平板流动中的熵产分析[J]. 计算物理, 2020, 37(2): 182-188.

LIU Mei, LI Shuguang, WU Zhengren, WANG Songling, DENG Yuhan. Entropy Generation Analysis for Grooved Structure Plate Flows[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2020, 37(2): 182-188.

参考文献

[1] ZHU D H, LIU Z Y, YUAN X J. Mechanism of delayed surface transition of hypersonic boundary layer on porous surface[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 33(2):163-169.
[2] SASAMORI M, MAMORI H, IWAMOTO K, et al. Experimental study on drag-reduction effect due to sinusoidal riblets in turbulent channel flow[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2014, 55(10):1-14.
[3] WALSH M. Turbulent boundary layer drag reduction using riblets[C]//AIAA, Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1982:769-787.
[4] BECHERT D, REIF W. On the drag reduction of the shark skin[C]. Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2013.
[5] LANG A W, MOTTA P, HIDALGO P, et al. Bristled shark skin:A microgeometry for boundary layer control[J]. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2008, 3(4):046005.
[6] JUNG Y C, BHUSHAN B. Biomimetic structures for fluid drag reduction in laminar and turbulent flows[J]. Journal of Physics:Condensed Matter, 2010, 22(3):035104.
[7] DJENIDI L, ANTONIA R A. Laser Doppler anemometer measurements of turbulent boundary layer over a riblet surface[J]. Aiaa Journal, 1996, 34(5):1007-1012.
[8] EI-SAMNI O A, YOON H S, CHUN H H. Turbulent flow over thin rectangular riblets[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2005, 19(9):1801-1810.
[9] BECHERT D W, BRUSE M, HAGE W, et al. Experiments on drag-reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1997, 338:59-87.
[10] DEBISSCHOP, NIEUWSTADT. Turbulent boundary layer in an adverse pressure gradient:Effectiveness of riblets[J]. AIAA,1996, 34:932-937.
[11] DEAN B, BHUSHAN B. Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulent flow:A review[J]. Philosophical Transactions, 2010, 368(1929):4775.
[12] CHU D C, KARNIADAKIS G E. A direct numerical simulation of laminar and turbulent flow over riblet-mounted surfaces[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1993, 250(-1):1-42.
[13] CHOI K S. Near-wall structure of a turbulent boundary layer with riblets[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1989, 208(-1):417-458.
[14] BECHERT D W, BARTENWERFER M. The viscous flow on surfaces with longitudinal ribs[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1989, 206(-1):105-129.
[15] SCHOLLE M, RUND A, AKSEL N. Drag reduction and improvement of material transport in creeping films[J]. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 2006, 75(2-3):93-112.
[16] LIU Z Y, HU H B, SONG B W, et al. Numerical simulation research about riblet surface with different spacing[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2009, 21(19):6025-6028.
[17] CHEN B, LIU G. POD reconstruction of channel flow and analysis of energy dissipation rate of turbulent flow[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2018, 35(2):169-177.
[18] CHENG X H, NIE Y F, CAI L, et al. Entropy stable format based on moving grid[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2017, 34(2):175-182.
[19] EIAMSA-ARD S, PROMVONGE P. Thermal characteristics of turbulent rib-grooved channel flows[J]. International Communications in Heat & Mass Transfer, 2009, 36(7):705-711.
[20] SONG B W, GUO Y H, HU H B, et al. Numerical study on drag reduction characteristics of microstructure superhydrophobic surface[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2013, 30(1):70-74.
[21] JIN Y, HERWIG H. Turbulent flow and heat transfer in channels with shark skin surfaces:Entropy generation and its physical significance[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2014, 70:10-22.
[22] GHASEMI E, MCELIGOT D M, NOLAN K P, et al. Effects of adverse and favorable pressure gradients on entropy generation in a transitional boundary layer region under the influence of freestream turbulence[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2014, 77:475-488.
[23] MCELIGOT D M, WALSH E J, LAURIEN E, et al. Entropy generation in the viscous parts of turbulent boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2008, 130(6):061205.
[24] NATERER G F, CHOMOKOVSKI S R. Entropy-based surface microprofiling for passive near-wall flow control[J]. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2007, 17(10):2138-2147.
[25] WALSH E, HERNON D. Unsteady volumetric entropy generation rate in laminar boundary layers[J]. Entropy, 2006, 8(1):25-30.
[26] KOCK F, HERWIG H. Local entropy production in turbulent shear flows:A high-Reynolds number model with wall functions[J]. International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer, 2004, 47(10-11):2205-2215.
[27] WANG B, WANG J D, ZHOU G. Drag reduction by microvortexes in transverse microgrooves[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 6(1):734012-734019.

带沟槽结构的平板流动中的熵产分析

Entropy Generation Analysis for Grooved Structure Plate Flows

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

作者中心

审稿中心

期刊浏览

期刊介绍

[1]	方乐, 王楚涵. 理性亚格子建模的实践与反思[J]. 计算物理, 2018, 35(3): 253-261.
[2]	潘宏禄, 李俊红, 程晓丽, 马汉东. 气动光学效应湍流脉动模型系数修正[J]. 计算物理, 2018, 35(2): 194-204.
[3]	李为君, 张云伟, 顾兆林, 段翠娥, 张力元, LU Weizhen Jane. 时变来流条件下大气边界层流动大涡模拟[J]. 计算物理, 2016, 33(6): 691-697.
[4]	上官燕琴, 王娴, 李跃明. 基于格子Boltzmann方法的平板射流大涡模拟[J]. 计算物理, 2015, 32(6): 669-676.
[5]	潘宏禄, 关发明, 袁湘江, 卜俊辉. 高超声速平板边界层/圆柱粗糙元非定常干扰[J]. 计算物理, 2015, 32(5): 537-544.
[6]	孙晨扬, 李启良, 杨志刚. 最小二乘有限元法求解非定常应力的Navier-Stokes方程[J]. 计算物理, 2015, 32(1): 13-19.
[7]	刘同新, 马宝峰. 低阶格式在大涡模拟计算中的适用性[J]. 计算物理, 2014, 31(3): 307-313.
[8]	邱剑, 顾兆林, 王赞社. 一种改进后的亚格子特征尺度表达式[J]. 计算物理, 2007, 24(6): 711-716.
[9]	谢志刚, 许春晓, 崔桂香, 王志石. 方柱绕流大涡模拟[J]. 计算物理, 2007, 24(2): 171-180.
[10]	许春晓, 吴超, 崔桂香. 壁面在展向作周期运动的槽道湍流的大涡模拟[J]. 计算物理, 2006, 23(5): 537-544.
[11]	王小华, 何钟怡. 肋片对后台阶湍流流动影响的数值模拟[J]. 计算物理, 2005, 22(4): 344-350.
[12]	夏健, 刘锋. 各向同性紊流能量衰减的大涡模拟[J]. 计算物理, 2005, 22(1): 61-64.
[13]	崔桂香, 周海兵, XU Chun-xiao, 张兆顺, L. Shao. 新型大涡数值模拟亚格子模型及应用[J]. 计算物理, 2004, 21(3): 289-293.
[14]	谢正桐, 李家春, 王丽丽. R-T界面不稳定性及湍流混合的大涡模拟[J]. 计算物理, 2002, 19(2): 108-114.
[15]	苏铭德. 弯曲矩形管道内充分发展流动的数值研究——第二部分:湍流[J]. 计算物理, 1995, 12(1): 47-53.