CH4/空气简化动力学机理数值验证

doi:10.19596/j.cnki.1001-246x.8061

计算物理 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 253-262.DOI: 10.19596/j.cnki.1001-246x.8061

• • 下一篇

CH₄/空气简化动力学机理数值验证

余亦泽¹, 徐胜利², 张竹鹤¹, 张梦萍¹

1. 中国科学技术大学数学学院, 安徽合肥 230026;
2. 清华大学航空航天学院, 北京 100084

收稿日期:2019-03-14 修回日期:2019-05-26 出版日期:2020-05-25 发布日期:2020-05-25
通讯作者: 徐胜利,E-mail:slxu@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
作者简介:余亦泽(1993-),男,湖北,博士生,研究方向为高精度计算,E-mail:yyz77@mail.ustc.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（11372306）资助项目

Numerical Validation of Three Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms of Methane Air Mixture

YU Yize¹, XU Shengli², ZHANG Zhuhe¹, ZHANG Mengping¹

1. School of Mathematics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China;
2. School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2019-03-14 Revised:2019-05-26 Online:2020-05-25 Published:2020-05-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选择绕圆柱预混燃烧算例，验证CH₄/空气三种简化动力学机理（16s41r、15s19r和53s325r）.考虑均匀来流，忽略湍流和湍流与燃烧相互作用以及燃料扩散效应，假设层流有限反应速率，采用保自由流5阶WENO格式求解多组分Euler方程组，得到CH₄/空气预混燃烧流场温度等值线、沿驻点线压力和温度及其CH₄、CO和CO₂质量百分数分布.结果表明：三种简化动力学机理给出的流场均出现弓形激波和火焰面，弓形激波和火焰驻点距离及其形状、诱导区宽度和简化动力学机理相关.当圆柱直径增大，弓形激波和火焰向圆柱上游移动，对应的驻点距离均增大，诱导区宽度变短，点火延时变小，但火焰和弓形激波位置次序未变化.53s325r模型要比16s41r模型和15s19r模型精度要高，点火延时覆盖的压力和温度范围也较宽，所有简化机理均未完全反应，在较大圆柱直径下游达到化学平衡.

关键词: WENO格式, 超声速流, 预混燃烧, 激波, 火焰

Abstract: Methane and air premixed combustion around a cylinder is chosen to evaluate reduced mechanisms of 16species/41steps, 15species/19steps and 53spesies/325steps. The coming flows are homogeneous. Turbulence and its interaction with combustion, fuel diffusion are neglected and finite reaction rates of chemistry are assumed in the computation. The 5th order WENO scheme that conserves free flow properties is used to mitigate derivative errors from unsmooth grids and increase solution accuracy. Pressure and temperature contours as well as their distributions along stagnation line are obtained including mass fractions of species CH₄, CO and CO₂. Bow shock and flame front both appear upstream the cylinder. Standoff distances and induction lengths are related to reduced mechanisms. With increasing cylindrical diameter, standoff distances increase and induction length decrease either for ignition delay. The bow shock and flame are both pushed upstream but they are still remained in sequence. In contrast to reduced models of 16species/41steps and 15species/19steps, 53spesies/325steps model provides good accuracy and ignition covers a wide range of pressure and temperature. Three models demonstrate incompletely burning or chemical reactions in all cases except cases of cylinders with large diameters. It shows that elementary reactions reach chemically equilibrium but the reactions are not so completely. Meanwhile, the larger cylindrical diameter, the better accuracy in evaluation of reduced chemistry mechanisms.

Key words: WENO scheme, supersonic flow, premixed combustion, shock, flame

中图分类号:

O355

余亦泽, 徐胜利, 张竹鹤, 张梦萍. CH₄/空气简化动力学机理数值验证[J]. 计算物理, 2020, 37(3): 253-262.

YU Yize, XU Shengli, ZHANG Zhuhe, ZHANG Mengping. Numerical Validation of Three Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms of Methane Air Mixture[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2020, 37(3): 253-262.

参考文献

[1] TURANYI T. Applications of sensitivity analysis to combustion chemistry[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1997, 57(1):41-48.
[2] DUNKER A M. The decoupled direct method for calculating sensitivity coefficients in chemical kinetics[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1984, 81(5):2385-2393.
[3] GRIFFITHS J F. Reduced kinetic models and their application to practical combustion systems[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1995, 21(1):25-107.
[4] TURANYI T, BERCES T, VAJDA S. Reaction rate analysis of complex kinetic systems[J]. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 1989, 21(2):83-99.
[5] ZHANG G, ZHAO P, ZHU M, et al. Pseudo-homogeneous modeling of un-stabilized filtration combustion[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2007, 24(5):605-611.
[6] CHEN J Y. Development of reduced mechanisms for numerical modelling of turbulent combustion[C]. Workshop on Numerical Aspects of Reduction in Chemical Kinetics, CERMICS-ENPC Cite Descartes Champus sur Marne, France, 1997.
[7] LIU J, CHENG X, WANG Q. The application of computational singular perturbation in reduced combustion reaction systems[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2005, 22(2):143-148.
[8] MASSIAS A, DIAMANTIS D, MASTORAKOS E, et al. An algorithm for the construction of global reduced mechanisms with CSP data[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1999, 117(4):685-708.
[9] DUCHÊNE P, ROUCHON P. Kinetic scheme reduction via geometric singular perturbation techniques[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1996, 51(20):4661-4672.
[10] 杨顺华, 肖保国, 钱炜祺. 乙烯燃烧简化化学动力学模型及其验证[J]. 实验流体力学, 2009, 23(2):1-4, 19.
[11] WANG H, CHEN Y. PDF modeling of local extinction and re-ignition within turbulent non-premixed flame[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2004, 21(6):471-476.
[12] YUNGSTER S, RABINOWITZ M J. Computation of shock-induced combustion using a detailed methane-air mechanism[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1994, 10(5):609-617.
[13] SOETRISNO M, IMLAY S, ROBERTS D. Numerical simulations of the transdetonative ram accelerator combusting flow field on a parallel computer[C]//28th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 1992:3249.
[14] CLUTTER K, KRISHNAMURTY V, SHYY W, et al. Combustion and turbulence effects in hypersonic projectile flows[C]//35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 1997:897.
[15] JIANG Y, SHU C W, ZHANG M. An alternative formulation of finite difference weighted ENO schemes with Lax-Wendroff time discretization for conservation laws[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2013, 35(2):A1137-A1160.
[16] JIANG Y, SHU C W, ZHANG M. Free-stream preserving finite difference schemes on curvilinear meshes[J]. Methods and Applications of Analysis, 2014, 21(1):001-030.
[17] KEE R J, RUPLEY F M, MILLER J A. Chemkin-II:A Fortran chemical kinetics package for the analysis of gas-phase chemical kinetics[R]. Sandia National Labs, Livermore, CA (USA), 1989.
[18] KUO K K. Principles of combustion[M]. 2005.
[19] SHUEN J S, LIOU M S, Van LEER B. Inviscid flux-splitting algorithms for real gases with non-equilibrium chemistry[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1990, 90(2):371-395.
[20] TOSHIMITSU K, MATSUO A, KAMEL M R, et al. Numerical simulations and planar laser-induced fluorescence imaging results of hypersonic reactive flows[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2000, 16(1):16-21.
[21] GOTTLIEB S, SHU C W, TADMOR E. Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods[J]. SIAM Review, 2001, 43(1):89-112.
[22] SRULIJES J, SMEETS G, SEILER F. Expansion tube experiments for the investigation of ram-accelerator-related combustion and gasdynamic problems[C]//28th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 1992:3246.
[23] LESCHEVICH V V, MARTYNENKO V V, PENYAZKOV O G, et al. Auto-ignitions of a methane/air mixture at high and intermediate temperatures[J]. Shock Waves, 2016, 26(5):657-672.

CH₄/空气简化动力学机理数值验证

Numerical Validation of Three Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms of Methane Air Mixture

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

作者中心

审稿中心

期刊浏览

期刊介绍

[1]	薛创, 李馨东, 孙文俊, 叶文华, 彭先觉. 多介质五方程简化模型及界面捕捉的人工压缩算法[J]. 计算物理, 2021, 38(3): 257-268.
[2]	李馨东, 赵英奎, 胡宗民, 姜宗林. 基于第二粘性的Navier-Stokes方程组求解正激波结构[J]. 计算物理, 2020, 37(5): 505-513.
[3]	李理, 刘晓艳, 李新亮, 田保林, 梁贤, 哈金才. 高精度格式非线性权的统计谱特性分析[J]. 计算物理, 2019, 36(2): 127-140.
[4]	郭子滔, 冯仁忠. 一种高精度的修正Hermite-ENO格式[J]. 计算物理, 2019, 36(2): 141-152.
[5]	丁生荣, 徐胜利, 卢键方, 张梦萍. rGFM和level-set方法在水柱群和喷管流场计算中的应用[J]. 计算物理, 2019, 36(2): 165-174.
[6]	王子昂, 余彬, 杭皓天, 张斌, 刘洪. 化学反应机理对激波与可燃氢气泡相互作用影响的数值研究[J]. 计算物理, 2018, 35(4): 388-396.
[7]	赵琪, 张梦萍, 徐胜利, 卢键方. 激波和单列水柱、气水固多界面相互作用的数值模拟[J]. 计算物理, 2018, 35(3): 285-293.
[8]	徐维铮, 孔祥韶, 吴卫国. 改进的三阶WENO-Z+格式及其应用[J]. 计算物理, 2018, 35(1): 13-21.
[9]	段茂昌, 蔚喜军, 陈大伟, 黄朝宝, 安娜. DG方法求解可压缩气固两相流动[J]. 计算物理, 2017, 34(6): 631-640.
[10]	李馨东, 赵英奎, 欧阳碧耀, 胡宗民, 姜宗林. 气体体积粘性对二维环形激波聚焦的影响[J]. 计算物理, 2017, 34(4): 394-402.
[11]	周杰, 徐胜利. SPH方法气-液界面边界条件研究[J]. 计算物理, 2017, 34(4): 409-416.
[12]	周杰, 徐胜利. SPH方法进出口数值边界条件研究[J]. 计算物理, 2016, 33(5): 516-522.
[13]	陈永彬, 唐智礼, 盛建达. 跨音速自然层流翼型多目标优化设计[J]. 计算物理, 2016, 33(3): 283-296.
[14]	蒋华, 董刚, 陈霄. 激波与火焰面相互作用数值模拟的GPU加速[J]. 计算物理, 2016, 33(1): 23-29.
[15]	潘宏禄, 关发明, 袁湘江, 卜俊辉. 高超声速平板边界层/圆柱粗糙元非定常干扰[J]. 计算物理, 2015, 32(5): 537-544.